So.
I don't talk politics very often on this blog (ehem, other than that period 2 years ago when all I would do is blog about Obama), and I'm not even sure this is a political screed, but I DO have something to say, and it's NOT about being a bridesmaid, nor a drunk, nor a person who judges and gets judged.
Well sorta.
Instead, I want to talk about the Charles Murray (from the AEI) piece in this past Sunday's Washington Post. Entitled, "
The tea party warns of a New Elite. They're right," Murray describes (mostly accurately, in my opinion) an interesting subculture that has emerged in America during the last 30 years of very well-educated, upper middle class, non-industrial workers that interbreed and produce super smart, super privileged children who just repeat the cycle again (going to Ivy colleges or sisters, then grad school, then finding a mate at grad school with the same credentials, and popping out little elitist wealthy babies).
Or something close to that.
It should be said that for the most part, I'm (ehem ehem) one of these people Murray is talking about. My parents both went to Rutgers, which isn't an Ivy or a sister but certainly is an excellent state school, my dad got his masters immediately thereafter, my mom this past year. Me and my lovely siblings grew up in relative wealth (compared not to our peers in NJ but certainly those around the country), never really wanting for anything, living, warmly ensconced, in one of those affluent suburbs of New York he sneeringly (I know it's sneeringly because I have said the same phrase in the same tone of voice) calls a "bubble of privilege" where we happily drove our used cars to the mall and hung out at chain restaurants on Friday nights.
I'm only being a LEETLE sarcastic here.
So it's not so much that I disagree with his premise, nor do I want to. In fact, I'm pretty sure I've said it on this space before (and I definitely say it on a regular basis in REAL life. My friends can only nod wearily when I start using the phrase "we've self-selected out" because they know where THAT'S going):
There are so many quintessentially American things that few members of the New Elite have experienced. They probably haven't ever attended a meeting of the Kiwanis Club or Rotary Club, or lived for at least a year in a small town (college doesn't count) or in an urban neighborhood in which most of their neighbors did not have college degrees (gentrifying neighborhoods don't count). They are unlikely to have spent at least a year with a family income less than twice the poverty line (graduate school deosn't count) or to have a close friend who is an evangelical Christian. They are unlikely to have even visted a favtory floor, let alone worked on one.
Now.
I do disagree with a FEW points. For example, Of my closest friends from college, 3/5 were from decidedly not upper middle class backgrounds, ranging from rural to non-gentrified urban. And yes, it was a good school. But still - it's not like I never ever met someone from a farm, or an evangelical Christian. My best friend's father STILL works on a farm, I lived with (and LOVE) a girl who believes she's going to heaven because she's accepted Jesus Christ as her Savior. And by the by, my dad works in a factory. Sure he's management. But it's a FACTORY people. Like, they make things there with machines!
I've SEEN it.
But as I said, I really don't want to argue those points, because in the end, I am as he said. A well educated, ridiculously lucky and blessed young woman who - if I do get married - will marry someone in my same subset of education, ambition and financial situation because at this point, that's all the people I know! There is of course a chance that I will meet and fall in love with someone in a different sphere of society than me, but it's unlikely.
Point Murray.
However, it is his extrapolated conclusion with which I take VEHEMENT umbrage:
The bubble that encases the New Elite crosses ideological lines and includes far too many of the people who have influence, great or small, on the course of the nation. They are not defective in their patriotism or lacking a generous spirit towards their fellow citizens. They are merely isolated and ignorant. The members of the New Elite may love America, but, increasingly, they are not of it.
VEHEMENT.
What REALLY gets my goad is that smug line "but, increasingly, they are not of it". Whenever anyone, be it AEI or de Toqueville or Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party or Twain decides to decree what America is - and therefore, who it is not - I find myself deeply rankled. And
selun moi (see what I did there? With the elitist French insertion?) Murray's postulation is merely an academic way to say "Take America Back".
To this I would ask - to where?
Because what is more American than immigrant-makes-good, marries an American, has three kids gives them all that he's got so they can become BETTER than the factory worker he is? What's more American than doing the best you possibly can for yourself and your kids? What's more American than a great education, coupled with hard work, becoming a senator, or a banker or a lawyer or doctor or President, when only a generation or two ago your family was farming the corn/tobacco in Illinois/Italy?
So don't give me this "not of it" shit.
Just because I don't know who replaced fucking Bob fucking Barker on the "the price is right" (no joke - that is one of Murray's arguments) - although... I feel like it's Drew Carey? - doesn't make me any more or less American than someone who does. Just like me being able to actually discuss why it's ridiculous that Tea Partiers want to repeal the 17th amendment to give more power to the states, but claim to be for the people and not for the elites doesn't make ME any more American than them.
Just you know. A little more historically well read.
(I mean, cmon now. Delve into the surface history - just skim it! - explaining the circumstances that explain why "elite" governors - and not "the people" - picked senators back in the day and just try to talk to me about how the 17th amendment wasn't a massive blow FOR us plebians.)
Anyway.
The point is, by virtue of the fact that we were born here we are all 100% American. The country therefore, is the sum of its parts (or perhaps even greater). It is Mad Men PLUS the Price is Right, Left Behind PLUS the New York Review of Books, you plus me plus Jimmie Johnson plus all my nonathletic fellow alums from Chicago.
Nothing is more "quintessentially American" than debate, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson - those first "real" Americans - made it true forevermore. But trying to say anyone is more or less American because they're more or less educated, more or less wealthy, more or less likely to be a "consultant" or a "miner" or anything, essentially, other than they were born here or they weren't but passed the test and took the oath? Well, that sounds a little "ignorant and isolated" to me.
In other words? The price is WRONG, bitch.